Skip to content

Add KIP-848 consumer groups support #2222

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
matanper wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add KIP-848 consumer groups support #2222

matanper wants to merge 5 commits into from
+361 −27

Conversation

@matanper
Copy link

@matanper matanper commented Feb 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

  • Split group listing by type (classic vs consumer)
  • Use DescribeConsumerGroups API for KIP-848 groups
  • Convert ConsumerGroupMember assignments to display format
  • Add groupType field to distinguish classic vs KIP-848 groups
  • Add Assigning and Reconciling states for KIP-848
  • Display 'consumer (KIP-848)' vs 'classic' in UI statistics

Address #1815

@matanper
Add KIP-848 consumer groups support
508d930 
- Split group listing by type (classic vs consumer)
- Use DescribeConsumerGroups API for KIP-848 groups
- Convert ConsumerGroupMember assignments to display format
- Add groupType field to distinguish classic vs KIP-848 groups
- Add Assigning and Reconciling states for KIP-848
- Display 'consumer (KIP-848)' vs 'classic' in UI statistics
@matanper
Add KIP-848 consumer groups support
dcbbe98 
- Split group listing by type (classic vs consumer)
- Use DescribeConsumerGroups API for KIP-848 groups
- Convert ConsumerGroupMember assignments to display format
- Add groupType field to distinguish classic vs KIP-848 groups
- Add Assigning and Reconciling states for KIP-848
- Display 'consumer (KIP-848)' vs 'classic' in UI statistics
@matanper matanper force-pushed the feature/kip-848-consumer-groups branch from 508d930 to dcbbe98 Compare February 10, 2026 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@tamtamirr tamtamirr tamtamirr approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@matanper @tamtamirr