Conversation
|
Wonderful. looking forward to reading. excellent seeing this pushed |
DanGould
left a comment
DanGould
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see every reason to commit what's here as a great start. I think my suggestions make it easier to read and adopt a frame consistent with reality and our past framing of it (privacy as a negative right rather than an entitlement)
semi-honest.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ | |||
| # Overview: Semi-honest multiparty PayJoin | |||
|
|
|||
| The following is a concrete description of the semi-honest multiparty PayJoin protocol. To understand why certain design choise were made, it is recommended to read the [overview document](./00_overview.md) first. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please commit ./00_overview to main. Until it's committed to the same branch or the link references the foreign branch this is a broken link
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Relative links should work as long as the path is correct. Its working here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't realize this PR was pushing to payjoin:overview and not payjoin:main. This is right. Please merge.
arminsabouri
force-pushed
the
semi-honest
branch
from
9a73a49 to
f4081bb
Compare
3 participants
Kickstarting the semihonest overview. There has been alot of questions (and misunderstandings) about concrete protocol details and the information is distributed (payjoin/rust-payjoin#362, payjoin/rust-payjoin#365, https://github.com/payjoin/btsim/blob/master/src/tx_contruction.rs, https://github.com/arminsabouri/lattice-psbt).
This is a living document that attempts to collect all the notes we have produced on this topic over the past year. And provides concrete details.
This is a living document. There is more to hash out, specifiy and bikeshed over .