Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change improves the type safety of the runCommand function in src/utils/shell.ts by replacing a @ts-expect-error with a type guard. This ensures that the shortMessage property is accessed safely, preventing potential runtime errors.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7477830526809253082 started by @serhalp

Replaces a @ts-expect-error with a type guard in the runCommand function.

When execa is called with the 'reject: false' option, the result can be either a success or an error object. The previous code used a type assertion to access the 'shortMessage' property, which is only present on the error object.

This commit adds a type guard to check for the existence of the 'shortMessage' property before accessing it, ensuring type safety and preventing potential runtime errors.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Benchmark results

Comparing with 321170d

  • Dependency count: 1,055 (no change)
  • Package size: 317 MB ⬇️ 0.00% decrease vs. 321170d
  • Number of ts-expect-error directives: 365 ⬇️ 0.27% decrease vs. 321170d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant