Skip to content

Conversation

@azurelinux-security
Copy link
Contributor

@azurelinux-security azurelinux-security commented Feb 3, 2026

Auto Patch gnupg2 for CVE-2026-24882.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1042290&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues
  • N/A
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for Azure Linux 2.0 labels Feb 3, 2026
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 17:10
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2026 17:10
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Patch matches upstream.

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

ptest regression happening in buddy build

Copy link
Contributor

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The ptest is regressing because the patch is meant for version 2.4.9. When I attempted to upgrade to 2.4.9 #15429, the build succeeded, but the pipelines kept getting stuck after several attempts. Then, I tried building 2.4.9 with this patch #15602, and both the build and ptest passed, but I still need to check the pipeline behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants