Feature/DataTranferserService Implemetation#439
Open
zhenbin-lin wants to merge 64 commits intomatth-x:mainfrom
Open
Feature/DataTranferserService Implemetation#439zhenbin-lin wants to merge 64 commits intomatth-x:mainfrom
zhenbin-lin wants to merge 64 commits intomatth-x:mainfrom
Conversation
1. Separate the message processing of OCPP1.6 and OCPP2.0.1 2. Reserve complete DataTransfer packets for extended DataTransfer operations
1. Finish base request for cost and idle fee. 2. Add new unit tests for operations of FinalCost, RunningCost and UserPrice. 3. Add a new funcation triggerMeterValues in MeteringService in order making external Services to trigger MeterValue. 4. Modify CMakeLists.txt add California Service.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @matth-x
I've created a new service called
DataTransferServicedesigned to route various types of DataTransfer Message based onvendorIdandmessageId.For the upcoming development work, could you please create a new branch named
feature/california-pricing-requirements? Alternatively, would it be better if I push my code directly to the existingdevelop/remodel-apibranch?Also, could you please check if there are any existing issues or discussions related to this RP that I should be aware of?
Thanks for your help!