docs: Document Python SDK remote table to_arrow/to_pandas limitations and alternatives #126
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… and alternatives
oqoqo-fix
bot
force-pushed
the
oqoqo/fix-gap-047
branch
from
b0b7cdf to
7899011
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Documented that Python remote tables (Cloud/Enterprise) do not support
table.to_arrow()andtable.to_pandas()methods. Clarified this is Python SDK specific and provided the alternative approach: use search queries with.to_arrow()on the results (e.g.,table.search(query).limit(n).to_arrow()).Files Changed
tables/index.mdx: Added Info block explaining remote table limitations and alternative data retrieval method. Updated DuckDB section Note to match.Created by Oqoqo