Decouple unit tests from hilt and robolectric#3580
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @andreia-ferreira, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the quality and maintainability of unit tests by reducing their reliance on Android-specific frameworks like Hilt and Robolectric. By decoupling tests, the codebase becomes more KMP-compatible and reduces boilerplate, leading to more focused and reliable tests. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request successfully decouples several unit tests from Hilt and Robolectric, which is a great step toward improving test performance and moving closer to Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) compatibility. The introduction of MainDispatcherRule and the improvements to TestCoroutineDispatchersModule for better test isolation are particularly valuable. I have identified a few instances where runTest should explicitly use the dispatcher from MainDispatcherRule to ensure that the test body and the code under test share the same scheduler, which is essential for reliable virtual time control.
...java/org/groundplatform/android/ui/offlineareas/selector/OfflineAreaSelectorViewModelTest.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rc/test/java/org/groundplatform/android/ui/datacollection/tasks/AbstractTaskViewModelTest.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3580 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 71.03% 71.03%
Complexity 1631 1631
=========================================
Files 331 331
Lines 8956 8956
Branches 998 998
=========================================
Hits 6362 6362
Misses 1998 1998
Partials 596 596 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
bff623a to
0dfe674
Compare
This PR removes unnecessary
BaseHiltTestand Robolectric usage from several unit tests (mainly UseCases) that had no real dependency on Android or DI infrastructure.The changes include:
testrulespackage and moved theFragmentScenarioRulethereTestCoroutineDispatchersModuleto not provide a static test dispatcher which meant the same dispatcher instance was shared for the entire test run. This could cause leftover coroutine state from one test class to leak into anotherOverall, this reduces boilerplate and Android-specific infrastructure in the tests and moves them closer to being KMP-compatible, with no significant impact on test runtime
@shobhitagarwal1612 PTAL?