Skip to content

Conversation

@Caideyipi
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title said.


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 21.42857% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 39.50%. Comparing base (c052179) to head (818d61e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...db/pipe/sink/protocol/writeback/WriteBackSink.java 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
...e/manager/pipe/source/IoTDBConfigRegionSource.java 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
...e/source/schemaregion/IoTDBSchemaRegionSource.java 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
.../pipe/source/dataregion/IoTDBDataRegionSource.java 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...ion/config/executor/ClusterConfigTaskExecutor.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...pipe/agent/task/execution/PipeSubtaskExecutor.java 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...tdb/db/protocol/session/InternalClientSession.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
.../apache/iotdb/commons/pipe/source/IoTDBSource.java 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #17197      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     39.51%   39.50%   -0.02%     
  Complexity      282      282              
============================================
  Files          5101     5101              
  Lines        341805   341839      +34     
  Branches      43518    43522       +4     
============================================
- Hits         135067   135042      -25     
- Misses       206738   206797      +59     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Caideyipi Caideyipi changed the title Pipe: Implemented the login check in customize method Pipe: Implemented the login check in customize method & Added mosaic to subtask string in logger & Optimized the error code of illegal pipe / pipe plugin name string Feb 11, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
2 Security Hotspots
5.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 5%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant