Fix typo: AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST → AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST

[PDGGK]

Summary

Fix typo in constant name: AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST → AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST

Fixes #17155

Changes

• AbstractCli.java: Rename constant from AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST to AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST
• Cli.java: Update all references (lines 188, 203) to use correct spelling

Notes

• The constant is package-private, so this rename is safe and won't affect external consumers
• Searched entire codebase - no other occurrences of this typo exist

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Hi, this is your first pull request in IoTDB project. Thanks for your contribution! IoTDB will be better because of you.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR fixes a spelling typo in a constant name, changing AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST to AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST throughout the CLI codebase. The typo was correctly identified in issue #17155, and this change ensures the constant name properly reflects its purpose of storing time aggregation operations.

Changes:

• Renamed the constant from AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST to AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST (fixing the misspelling of "aggregate")
• Updated all usages of the constant in the codebase

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
AbstractCli.java	Renamed the constant definition from AGGREGRATE_TIME_LIST to AGGREGATE_TIME_LIST
Cli.java	Updated both references (lines 188, 203) to use the corrected constant name

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[PDGGK]

Good catch! You're right - I checked and this list is only written to but never read anywhere. It's dead code.

I'll update this PR to remove the variable entirely instead of just fixing the typo.

Thanks for the review!

[miantalha45]

Hi @HTHou, I had already opened this issue and marked my interest in working on it. However, I noticed that @PDGGK submitted a PR without prior discussion or assignment.

@PDGGK, could you please consider closing this PR so the contribution process remains fair and organized? Thank you for your understanding.