Skip to content

docs(secure-payments): add integration guide and refine secure payment docs for practical implementation#49

Open
aimensahnoun wants to merge 1 commit into02-12-docs_secure-payments_add_standalone_secure_payment_pages_docs_and_api_reference_clarify_support_model_and_simplify_integration_guidancefrom
02-13-docs_secure-payments_add_integration_guide_and_refine_secure_payment_docs_for_practical_implementation
Open

docs(secure-payments): add integration guide and refine secure payment docs for practical implementation#49
aimensahnoun wants to merge 1 commit into02-12-docs_secure-payments_add_standalone_secure_payment_pages_docs_and_api_reference_clarify_support_model_and_simplify_integration_guidancefrom
02-13-docs_secure-payments_add_integration_guide_and_refine_secure_payment_docs_for_practical_implementation

Conversation

@aimensahnoun
Copy link
Member

@aimensahnoun aimensahnoun commented Feb 13, 2026

Add Secure Payment Integration Guide with end-to-end implementation examples

This PR adds a comprehensive integration guide for Secure Payment Pages that covers:

  • End-to-end integration flow with a webhook-driven architecture
  • Prerequisites for production setup: API key or Client ID, webhook endpoint, and webhook signing secret
  • Practical quickstart steps for creating secure payment links, storing requestIds, redirecting payers, and processing webhooks
  • Implementation-ready code snippets for:
    • URL generation with the API
    • Redirect patterns (same tab/new tab options)
    • Webhook signature verification with request reconciliation
  • Documentation on link expiry behavior (one week default) with renewal flow guidance
  • Troubleshooting section for common integration issues (auth errors, token expiry, completed payments, webhook processing)

The guide is designed to be compatible with both frontend (Client ID) and backend integration patterns, focusing on product behavior rather than implementation specifics.

The new guide is added to the existing Secure Payment Pages section in the navigation structure.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 02-13-docs_secure-payments_add_integration_guide_and_refine_secure_payment_docs_for_practical_implementation

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@greptile-apps
Copy link

greptile-apps bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive Secure Payment integration guide that provides end-to-end implementation examples for webhook-driven payment flows. The guide covers prerequisites, quickstart steps, practical code snippets for URL generation and redirect patterns, webhook signature verification with request reconciliation, link expiry handling, and troubleshooting common integration issues. The documentation follows Mintlify style guidelines with proper component usage (<Steps>, <CodeGroup>, <AccordionGroup>, <CardGroup>), clear structure, and actionable code examples. The navigation structure has been correctly updated to include the new guide within the Secure Payment Pages section.

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with no issues identified
  • The PR adds documentation-only changes with well-structured content that follows established style guidelines. Code examples are properly formatted, secure (using environment variables for secrets), and follow best practices (HMAC signature verification, timing-safe comparison). No logic errors, syntax issues, or security vulnerabilities present.
  • No files require special attention

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
api-features/secure-payment-integration-guide.mdx New comprehensive integration guide added with webhook-driven architecture, code examples, and troubleshooting. Well-structured and follows style guidelines.
docs.json Navigation structure updated to include new integration guide page within Secure Payment Pages group.

Last reviewed commit: abca038

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 files reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Copy link

@bassgeta bassgeta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Payment status: secure ✅

…t docs for practical implementation

Add a new Secure Payment Integration Guide covering end-to-end integration flow
Document prerequisites for production setup: API key or Client ID, webhook endpoint, and webhook signing secret
Include practical quickstart guidance for creating secure payment links, storing requestIds, redirecting payers, and reconciling payment state through webhooks
Add implementation-ready code snippets for URL generation, redirect patterns (same tab/new tab), and webhook signature verification with request reconciliation
Document default link expiry behavior (one week) and recommended renewal flow for expired links
Add focused troubleshooting for common integration issues (auth headers, token expiry, completed payments, and webhook processing)
Update language to avoid backend-only assumptions and order-specific data models, keeping the guide compatible with both frontend (Client ID) and backend integration patterns
Move messaging to product-facing behavior and remove internal/implementation-specific framing where not needed
Keep Secure Payment Pages as a standalone feature area and wire the integration guide into API Features navigation`
@aimensahnoun aimensahnoun force-pushed the 02-12-docs_secure-payments_add_standalone_secure_payment_pages_docs_and_api_reference_clarify_support_model_and_simplify_integration_guidance branch from 638e370 to e3b2264 Compare February 13, 2026 14:32
@aimensahnoun aimensahnoun force-pushed the 02-13-docs_secure-payments_add_integration_guide_and_refine_secure_payment_docs_for_practical_implementation branch from abca038 to 0ed147f Compare February 13, 2026 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants