docs(secure-payments): add integration guide and refine secure payment docs for practical implementation#49
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryThis PR adds a comprehensive Secure Payment integration guide that provides end-to-end implementation examples for webhook-driven payment flows. The guide covers prerequisites, quickstart steps, practical code snippets for URL generation and redirect patterns, webhook signature verification with request reconciliation, link expiry handling, and troubleshooting common integration issues. The documentation follows Mintlify style guidelines with proper component usage ( Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Last reviewed commit: abca038 |
…t docs for practical implementation Add a new Secure Payment Integration Guide covering end-to-end integration flow Document prerequisites for production setup: API key or Client ID, webhook endpoint, and webhook signing secret Include practical quickstart guidance for creating secure payment links, storing requestIds, redirecting payers, and reconciling payment state through webhooks Add implementation-ready code snippets for URL generation, redirect patterns (same tab/new tab), and webhook signature verification with request reconciliation Document default link expiry behavior (one week) and recommended renewal flow for expired links Add focused troubleshooting for common integration issues (auth headers, token expiry, completed payments, and webhook processing) Update language to avoid backend-only assumptions and order-specific data models, keeping the guide compatible with both frontend (Client ID) and backend integration patterns Move messaging to product-facing behavior and remove internal/implementation-specific framing where not needed Keep Secure Payment Pages as a standalone feature area and wire the integration guide into API Features navigation`
638e370 to
e3b2264
Compare
abca038 to
0ed147f
Compare

Add Secure Payment Integration Guide with end-to-end implementation examples
This PR adds a comprehensive integration guide for Secure Payment Pages that covers:
The guide is designed to be compatible with both frontend (Client ID) and backend integration patterns, focusing on product behavior rather than implementation specifics.
The new guide is added to the existing Secure Payment Pages section in the navigation structure.