Datadog mcp

[nccatoni]

Motivation

This can be useful for users that want to get test results form the CI

Changes

Workflow

1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
3. Mark it as ready for review
   • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
   • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

• Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
• A docker base image is modified?
  • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
• A scenario is added, removed or renamed?
  • Get a review from R&P team

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

.cursor/mcp.json                                                        @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/libraries_and_scenarios_rules.yml                         @DataDog/system-tests-core

[robertomonteromiguel]

I think we should find a place to mention this in our repo documentation:

• https://github.com/DataDog/system-tests?tab=readme-ov-file#ai-integration-guidelines-supported-tools-and-implementation-guide

or here

• https://github.com/DataDog/system-tests/blob/main/docs/ai/ai-tools-integration-guide.md