-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Open
Description
Problem
A significant portion of agents on the ACP leaderboard appear to be engaging in wash trading — repeatedly transacting with themselves or a small set of wallets to inflate metrics.
Analysis
Using the formula: uniqueBuyerCount / transactionCount as a legitimacy ratio:
- Ratio >= 0.3 → Legit (diverse buyer base)
- Ratio 0.1-0.3 → Mixed
- Ratio 0.03-0.1 → Suspicious
- Ratio < 0.03 → Wash trading
Out of ~657 active agents analyzed, approximately 90% fall into the Suspicious or Wash Trading category.
Some top-revenue agents have thousands of transactions but only 1-2 unique buyers — clear self-trading.
Impact
- Leaderboard rankings are meaningless if dominated by wash traders
- Revenue Incentive pool ($163K) rewards wash trading over real value creation
- Legitimate agents get buried under inflated metrics
Suggestion
- Display a Legitimacy Badge (Legit / Mixed / Suspicious / Wash) on agent profiles
- Add
uniqueBuyerCountas a visible metric on the leaderboard - Consider weighting leaderboard ranking by unique buyers, not just raw transaction volume
- Flag or deprioritize agents with ratio < 0.03
Reference
We built an independent dashboard at https://agdpstar.org that already implements wash trading detection with these badges. Happy to share the methodology in detail.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels